Results/Trends Results
ECI results
Analysis · over time

How elections changed

Karnataka, 1962–2024. 16 general elections tracked.

Turnout
70.89%
↑ 2.12 pts from previous
Median margin
8.25%
↓ 2.85 pts from previous
Effective parties
2.3
↓ 0.28 from previous
NOTA
0.56%
↓ 0.15 pts from previous
Women elected
7.14%
↑ 3.57 pts from previous

[01]Turnout

Weighted votes ÷ electors, election by election
2024 70.89%28 seats
2019 68.77%28 seats
2014 67.17%28 seats
2009 58.81%28 seats
2004 64.99%28 seats
1999 67.58%28 seats
1998 64.92%28 seats
1996 60.22%28 seats
1991 54.81%28 seats
1989 67.53%28 seats
1984 65.67%28 seats
1980 57.71%28 seats
1977 63.2%28 seats
1971 55.44%27 seats
1967 59.95%27 seats
1962 56.54%26 seats

[02]How close the contests were

Median winning margin, election by election
2024 8.25%28 seats
2019 11.1%28 seats
2014 8.45%28 seats
2009 4.35%28 seats
2004 5.2%28 seats
1999 6.35%28 seats
1998 11.45%28 seats
1996 3.9%28 seats
1991 9.2%28 seats
1989 16.9%28 seats
1984 10.95%28 seats
1980 30.25%28 seats
1977 17.85%28 seats
1971 44.97%27 seats
1967 13.72%27 seats
1962 13.36%26 seats

[03]Ballot crowding

Candidates per seat over time
2024 16.9474 candidates
2019 17.1478 candidates
2014 15.5434 candidates
2009 15.3427 candidates
2004 6.1172 candidates
1999 4.6130 candidates
1998 7.1200 candidates
1996 34.9978 candidates
1991 14.0391 candidates
1989 8.6242 candidates
1984 11.9334 candidates
1980 6.8190 candidates
1977 3.598 candidates
1971 3.9104 candidates
1967 3.7100 candidates
1962 3.488 candidates

[04]Party fragmentation

Effective number of parties by vote share
2024 2.33 of 58 won seats
2019 2.64 of 63 won seats
2014 2.73 of 39 won seats
2009 3.03 of 32 won seats
2004 3.33 of 16 won seats
1999 3.23 of 13 won seats
1998 3.84 of 25 won seats
1996 3.64 of 19 won seats
1991 3.43 of 22 won seats
1989 3.02 of 14 won seats
1984 2.52 of 7 won seats
1980 2.52 of 8 won seats
1977 2.12 of 5 won seats
1971 1.91 of 10 won seats
1967 3.25 of 8 won seats
1962 3.12 of 8 won seats

[05]NOTA

None of the above, as a share of votes cast
2024 0.56%2,18,343 votes
2019 0.71%2,50,810 votes
2014 0.83%2,57,873 votes

[06]Deposits lost

Share of candidates polling under a sixth of valid votes
2024 88.19%418 of 474
2019 88.29%422 of 478
2014 85.71%372 of 434
2009 84.78%362 of 427
2004 59.3%102 of 172
1999 53.85%70 of 130
1998 64.5%129 of 200
1996 92.54%905 of 978
1991 81.07%317 of 391
1989 74.79%181 of 242
1984 83.23%278 of 334
1980 65.79%125 of 190
1977 42.86%42 of 98
1971 50.0%52 of 104
1967 38.0%38 of 100
1962 37.5%33 of 88

[07]Women elected

Share of winners who are women
2019 7.14%28 seats
2014 3.57%28 seats
2009 3.57%28 seats
2004 7.14%28 seats
1999 7.14%28 seats
1996 3.57%28 seats
1991 10.71%28 seats
1989 3.57%28 seats
1984 7.14%28 seats
1977 3.57%28 seats
1971 3.7%27 seats
1967 3.7%27 seats
1962 3.85%26 seats

[08]Incumbent re-election rate

Share of sitting members who won again
2019 62.5%15 of 24 re-elected
2014 69.57%16 of 23 re-elected
2009 58.82%10 of 17 re-elected
2004 54.55%12 of 22 re-elected
1999 46.15%12 of 26 re-elected
1998 39.13%9 of 23 re-elected
1996 21.05%4 of 19 re-elected
1991 73.91%17 of 23 re-elected
1989 84.21%16 of 19 re-elected
1984 78.95%15 of 19 re-elected
1980 47.37%9 of 19 re-elected
1977 94.12%16 of 17 re-elected
1971 61.9%13 of 21 re-elected
1967 69.23%9 of 13 re-elected

[09]Computed insights

Arithmetic over the series above, not commentary
  1. Turnout has risen for three elections running: 67.17% (2014) → 68.77% (2019) → 70.89% (2024).

    three consecutive rises
  2. Ballots have grown much more crowded: 3.4 candidates a seat in 1962 against 16.9 in 2024.

    3.4 → 16.9 over 16 elections
  3. Women's share of elected members peaked at 10.71% in 1991; in 2019 it was 7.14%.

    peak 10.71% in 1991
  4. In 2019, 62.5% of sitting members who re-stood were re-elected — above the series average of 61.53%.

    62.5 vs avg 61.53 across 14 elections
  5. NOTA peaked at 0.83% in 2014 — 2,57,873 voters chose none of the above.

    highest NOTA share across 3 elections
  6. The highest deposit-loss rate was 92.54% in 1996: 905 of 978 candidates polled under a sixth of the valid vote.

    peak deposit losses in 1996
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload